So because of an unfortunate side effect of being job-free the last 5 months, I'm completely broke. I had to get a job. Two jobs in fact.
On the 31st I will begin training for Hudson Bay Company of Illinois, which is a progressive political fundraising group. Most people I've talked to seem to think it's an excellent job, which gives me a lot of hope. However one person, a person I don't know that well but nevertheless consider to be very honest, perhaps too honest, seems to have mixed feelings about HBC. She mentioned it could either steal my soul or enrich my self worth. Perhaps the "steal your soul" part is a referrence to the normal dreads of long work days, but other than that I have no idea what she could mean by it. A couple of other friends of mine will be starting work there too, so I imagine it may not be too bad.
This week I began training at Walmart. Does that sound odd? Oh.... count on it.... I'll be a part-time cashier at the front end. I have VERY mixed feelings of this job. Here are the primary reasons:
--I saw the anti-Walmart movie back when Nebraskans for Peace/Green {Party showed it at the Ross theatre, I think it made a very convincing case. I also followed the media's reaction to it, which included such pro-Walmart arguments as "the people keep shopping here, they vote with their feet." Well last night's training session, our trainer used that exact same phrase, "vote with their feet." It made me reflect on corporate influence in the media, where it takes hundreds of thousands of grassroots movie showings to get our message out, Walmart apparently can just put out a press release with a catchy phrase ("vote with their feet") and get mainstream media coverage. The disparity is depressing, really.
--Again, at training last night we got the opportunity to watch some films. Some of them rather benign, e.g. a film about proper lifting techniques not to harm yourself. One, however, was not benign. It was titled something to the effect of "Why Walmart was a good choice for work." It ran about 25-30 minutes. Much of this time was taken up with explaining why "Walmart employees do not need unions." Ah, so the real motive comes out. The reasons were as follows, with my thoughts on them below.
1. Walmart "already" provides amazing benefits.
I put "already" in quotes because it's disingenuous. In fact, the only benefits immediately available to us in training were the Starbridge medical insurance program (a very basic, cheap, insurance) and the 10% employee discount. Other than that, yes Walmart seems to have decent benefits after a period of time, including scholarships which I might even apply for.
2. A union would endanger these benefits because they're the only things available to put on the negotiation table.
Just an outright lie, a union can demand any legal benefit it wants, from the benefits Walmart offers to higher pay to other benefits such as longer breaks, better recourse to legal representation, anti-discrimination policies, etc. A union, assuming it acts as a rational economic and political organization, would only demand something more in return for a loss of benefits.
3. Walmart's "special relationship" with it's "Associates" (employees) means individuals can propose ideas and negotiate themselves with their superiors.
This is just nonsense, as well as a misrepresentation of what unions do. First, every business claims it has an "open door" policy or "special relationship"
of accepting creative ideas from it's employees. Obviously not every business follows through on its words. Walmart provided us with no important examples of how they do otherwise. Second, a union forms a unique economic pressure on a company that an individual cannot ever perform. When a union threatens to strike it often has enough people to cause some sort of profit loss to the company. When an individual does so, s/he is replaceable, as Walmart history has shown.
This is an excellent article on the subject.So, I dunno. I doubt I'll enjoy working there, but I can make it through the summer. I'll enjoy HBC much more.